Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaAnother controversial teacher-disciple relationship. Pierre Bourdieu & Luc Boltanski, around the problem of the action and the axiology of the researcher
This article seeks to measure the differences between the structural constructivist sociology of P. Bourdieu and the pragmatic sociology of L. Boltanski. We chose to cover some axes of the works of both authors, proposing in each one hypothesis of rupture or continuity. First, the way they define th...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.relmecs.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/Relmecse033 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/27565 |
| Sumario: | This article seeks to measure the differences between the structural constructivist sociology of P. Bourdieu and the pragmatic sociology of L. Boltanski. We chose to cover some axes of the works of both authors, proposing in each one hypothesis of rupture or continuity. First, the way they define the problem of the action and how it is generated. Second, the spaces in which the action takes place and in what way they condition it. And finally, how they deal with the problem of political-ethics and the axiological dimension of the sociologist's work. |
|---|