Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaStrategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity
This paper proposes that the limited dialogue and debate amongst groups of academics from different regions and perspectives have contributed to the unlimited expansion of the strategic spectrum and the themes that cover strategic studies. From a methodological perspective and in order to develop th...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Revistas |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
FLACSO - Sede Ecuador
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3324 |
| _version_ | 1809907037616734208 |
|---|---|
| author | Salgado Espinoza, Raúl Barreiro Martínez, Daniela Alejandra |
| author_facet | Salgado Espinoza, Raúl Barreiro Martínez, Daniela Alejandra |
| author_sort | Salgado Espinoza, Raúl |
| collection | Revista |
| description | This paper proposes that the limited dialogue and debate amongst groups of academics from different regions and perspectives have contributed to the unlimited expansion of the strategic spectrum and the themes that cover strategic studies. From a methodological perspective and in order to develop this argument, this article provides a descriptive-analytical study of the literature of the field of strategic studies, from three different angles: worldwide, regional and national. The text develops with the fundamental premise that “strategy”, as object of study, has lost its original content as an analytical concept as a result of the broadening of its meaning. |
| format | Revistas |
| id | urvio-article-3324 |
| institution | URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad |
| language | Español |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | FLACSO - Sede Ecuador |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | urvio-article-33242021-07-13T03:39:18Z Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity Estudios estratégicos: entre la rigurosidad y la subjetividad / Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity Salgado Espinoza, Raúl Barreiro Martínez, Daniela Alejandra desarrollo conceptual Ecuador estudios estratégicos guerra Latinoamérica This paper proposes that the limited dialogue and debate amongst groups of academics from different regions and perspectives have contributed to the unlimited expansion of the strategic spectrum and the themes that cover strategic studies. From a methodological perspective and in order to develop this argument, this article provides a descriptive-analytical study of the literature of the field of strategic studies, from three different angles: worldwide, regional and national. The text develops with the fundamental premise that “strategy”, as object of study, has lost its original content as an analytical concept as a result of the broadening of its meaning. El presente artículo propone que los reducidos diálogos y debates entre los grupos académicos provenientes de las diferentes regiones y perspectivas han contribuido a la expansión ilimitada de las temáticas abarcadas por los estudios estratégicos. Desde una perspectiva metodológica y para desarrollar este argumento, este artículo hace un análisis descriptivo-analítico de la literatura sobre los estudios estratégicos desde tres diferentes encuadres: mundial, regional y nacional. El texto se desarrolla con la premisa fundamental de que la “estrategia” como objeto de estudio ha perdido su cualidad de concepto analítico a causa de su ampliación más allá de lo militar. Abstract This paper proposes that the limited dialogue and debate amongst groups of academics from different regions and perspectives have contributed to the unlimited expansion of the strategic spectrum and the themes that cover strategic studies. From a methodological perspective and in order to develop this argument, this article provides a descriptive-analytical study of the literature of the field of strategic studies, from three different angles: worldwide, regional and national. The text develops with the fundamental premise that “strategy”, as object of study, has lost its original content as an analytical concept as a result of the broadening of its meaning. FLACSO - Sede Ecuador 2018-05-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3324 10.17141/urvio.22.2018.3324 URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad; No. 22 (2018): Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad (Junio 2018-noviembre 2018); 8-23 URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad; Núm. 22 (2018): Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad (Junio 2018-noviembre 2018); 8-23 1390-4299 1390-3691 10.17141/urvio.22.2018 spa https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3324/2280 https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3324/2281 https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3324/2282 |
| spellingShingle | Salgado Espinoza, Raúl Barreiro Martínez, Daniela Alejandra Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| title | Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| title_full | Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| title_fullStr | Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| title_short | Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| title_sort | strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity |
| url | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3324 |