Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School

The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Revelo, Michael Daniel
Formato: Revistas
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: FLACSO - Sede Ecuador 2018
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157
_version_ 1809907036833447936
author Revelo, Michael Daniel
author_facet Revelo, Michael Daniel
author_sort Revelo, Michael Daniel
collection Revista
description The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda.
format Revistas
id urvio-article-3157
institution URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad
language Español
publishDate 2018
publisher FLACSO - Sede Ecuador
record_format ojs
spelling urvio-article-31572021-07-13T03:39:21Z Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School Securitización como supervivencia, securitización como actos del habla: crítica a la Escuela de Copenhague / Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School Revelo, Michael Daniel Teoría de securitización Escuela de Copenhague agentes securitizadores estudios de seguridad The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda. El presente trabajo evalúa los postulados y la aplicación de la teoría de securitización (TS) de la Escuela de Copenhague —Ole Wæver, Barry Buzan y Jaap de Wilde — para indagar sobre aquellos cuestionamientos que posicionan a esta como una teoría conservadora dentro de los estudios de seguridad por adoptar y reforzar principios propios de los enfoques tradicionales. Con dicho fin, se examina cómo afecta a la TS adoptar las concepciones de la seguridad como supervivencia y la producción de la seguridad a través de procesos intersubjetivos de construcción de amenazas bajo la lógica de la teoría de los actos del habla y los roles y funciones determinados para agentes securitizadores y audiencias que privilegian las experiencias de un grupo en detrimento de otros. Con base en el análisis de estos postulados, este documento critica la metodología propuesta por esta escuela, misma que restringe el cambio del objeto de referencia y la ampliación de la agenda de seguridad. Abstract The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda. FLACSO - Sede Ecuador 2018-05-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157 10.17141/urvio.22.2018.3157 URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad; No. 22 (2018): Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad (Junio 2018-noviembre 2018); 58-69 URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad; Núm. 22 (2018): Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad (Junio 2018-noviembre 2018); 58-69 1390-4299 1390-3691 10.17141/urvio.22.2018 spa https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157/2289 https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157/2290 https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157/2291 Derechos de autor 2018 URVIO - Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad
spellingShingle Revelo, Michael Daniel
Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
title Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
title_full Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
title_fullStr Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
title_full_unstemmed Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
title_short Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
title_sort securitization as survival, securitization as a speech act: a critic to the copenhagen school
url https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157