Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Revistas |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
FLACSO - Sede Ecuador
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157 |
_version_ | 1809907036833447936 |
---|---|
author | Revelo, Michael Daniel |
author_facet | Revelo, Michael Daniel |
author_sort | Revelo, Michael Daniel |
collection | Revista |
description | The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda. |
format | Revistas |
id | urvio-article-3157 |
institution | URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad |
language | Español |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | FLACSO - Sede Ecuador |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | urvio-article-31572021-07-13T03:39:21Z Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School Securitización como supervivencia, securitización como actos del habla: crítica a la Escuela de Copenhague / Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School Revelo, Michael Daniel Teoría de securitización Escuela de Copenhague agentes securitizadores estudios de seguridad The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda. El presente trabajo evalúa los postulados y la aplicación de la teoría de securitización (TS) de la Escuela de Copenhague —Ole Wæver, Barry Buzan y Jaap de Wilde — para indagar sobre aquellos cuestionamientos que posicionan a esta como una teoría conservadora dentro de los estudios de seguridad por adoptar y reforzar principios propios de los enfoques tradicionales. Con dicho fin, se examina cómo afecta a la TS adoptar las concepciones de la seguridad como supervivencia y la producción de la seguridad a través de procesos intersubjetivos de construcción de amenazas bajo la lógica de la teoría de los actos del habla y los roles y funciones determinados para agentes securitizadores y audiencias que privilegian las experiencias de un grupo en detrimento de otros. Con base en el análisis de estos postulados, este documento critica la metodología propuesta por esta escuela, misma que restringe el cambio del objeto de referencia y la ampliación de la agenda de seguridad. Abstract The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda. FLACSO - Sede Ecuador 2018-05-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157 10.17141/urvio.22.2018.3157 URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad; No. 22 (2018): Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad (Junio 2018-noviembre 2018); 58-69 URVIO. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad; Núm. 22 (2018): Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad (Junio 2018-noviembre 2018); 58-69 1390-4299 1390-3691 10.17141/urvio.22.2018 spa https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157/2289 https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157/2290 https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157/2291 Derechos de autor 2018 URVIO - Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad |
spellingShingle | Revelo, Michael Daniel Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School |
title | Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School |
title_full | Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School |
title_fullStr | Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School |
title_full_unstemmed | Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School |
title_short | Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School |
title_sort | securitization as survival, securitization as a speech act: a critic to the copenhagen school |
url | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157 |