| Sumario: | Pavel A. Florenskij’s philosophical and theological beliefs
have been subject to critical consideratíons which can and should
be signalled with some serums and even harmful misconceptions.
On the other hand, they have received their fair and necessary
appreciation, given their valué and their influence on important
developments in western philosophy and theology. The article
examines the manifest oscilation oí this critique, and focuses on
three main issues: (1) the question o í the epistolary style in
“Stolp", (2) the question oí orthodox theodicy, and (3) the question
oí a renewed reason in view o í the mystery of grief.
|
|---|
Biblioteca Digital de Vanguardia