Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaPublic interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español
The Argentine Legislative Power passed Law No. 26522 on Audiovisual Communication Services (LACS)on October 10, 2009. It called into question the historical relationship among the political, socio-culturaland economic objectives that guided the regulation and represented a new notion of ‘public inte...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Revistas |
| Lenguaje: | Español Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador)
2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07 |
| _version_ | 1782340258278408192 |
|---|---|
| author | Koziner, Nadia |
| author_facet | Koziner, Nadia |
| author_sort | Koziner, Nadia |
| collection | Revista |
| description | The Argentine Legislative Power passed Law No. 26522 on Audiovisual Communication Services (LACS)on October 10, 2009. It called into question the historical relationship among the political, socio-culturaland economic objectives that guided the regulation and represented a new notion of ‘public interest’. Theprocess of debate and approval of the Law occupied a significant space on the media agenda, although itwas defined from particular frames that formulated diagnoses, evaluations and prescriptions. Analyzingthe journalistic treatment of this matter is important because it involved the interests of the field where themedia themselves take part. In addition, they are considered publicly prominent co-constructors of socialreality, so they collaborated with the production of narratives about the debate around the Law. This workstudies the news frames of the LACS in the Argentine economic press, observes the evolution of theseframes throughout the debate and approval of the Law and compares how the newspapers defined the aspectsunder discussion. The quantitative content analysis identified three frames in tension: ‘political andinstitutional dispute’, ‘sociocultural public interest’ and ‘business public interest’, which behavior variedaccording to the newspaper and registered fluctuations throughout the period under study. |
| format | Revistas |
| id | oai:revistas.ups.edu.ec:article-4607 |
| institution | Universitas |
| language | Español Inglés |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador) |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:revistas.ups.edu.ec:article-46072021-03-09T15:14:02Z Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español ¿Interés público o interés publicado? La regulación de medios argentinos en la prensa económica: Español Koziner, Nadia Argentina Regulación Encuadres Interés Público Prensa Press Argentina regulation frames public interest information The Argentine Legislative Power passed Law No. 26522 on Audiovisual Communication Services (LACS)on October 10, 2009. It called into question the historical relationship among the political, socio-culturaland economic objectives that guided the regulation and represented a new notion of ‘public interest’. Theprocess of debate and approval of the Law occupied a significant space on the media agenda, although itwas defined from particular frames that formulated diagnoses, evaluations and prescriptions. Analyzingthe journalistic treatment of this matter is important because it involved the interests of the field where themedia themselves take part. In addition, they are considered publicly prominent co-constructors of socialreality, so they collaborated with the production of narratives about the debate around the Law. This workstudies the news frames of the LACS in the Argentine economic press, observes the evolution of theseframes throughout the debate and approval of the Law and compares how the newspapers defined the aspectsunder discussion. The quantitative content analysis identified three frames in tension: ‘political andinstitutional dispute’, ‘sociocultural public interest’ and ‘business public interest’, which behavior variedaccording to the newspaper and registered fluctuations throughout the period under study. El Poder Legislativo argentino aprobó la Ley N° 26522 de Servicios de Comunicación Audiovisual(LSCA) el 10 de octubre de 2009. Esta puso en cuestión la histórica relación entre los objetivos de ordenpolítico, sociocultural y económico que habían orientado la regulación y propuso una nueva noción de‘interés público’. El derrotero que siguió el debate y la sanción de la Ley ocupó un lugar significativoen la agenda mediática, aunque fue definido desde marcos particulares que formularon diagnósticos,evaluaciones y prescripciones. Analizar el tratamiento periodístico de este asunto cobra importancia porcuanto implicó los intereses del ámbito del cual los propios forman parte. Además, se los considera coconstructores públicamente destacados de realidad social, por lo cual colaboraron con la producción delos relatos del debate acerca de la Ley. Este trabajo analiza los frames noticiosos de la LSCA en los periódicoseconómicos argentinos, observa la evolución de dichos encuadres a lo largo del debate y sanciónde la norma y compara las maneras en que los matutinos definieron los aspectos puestos en discusión.A partir del análisis de contenido cuantitativo, se identifican tres frames en tensión: ‘disputa política einstitucional, ‘interés púbico sociocultural’ e ‘interés público empresario’, cuyo comportamiento variósegún el matutino y registró fluctuaciones a lo largo del período estudiado. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador) 2021-02-22 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/zip application/pdf https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07 10.17163/uni.n34.2021.07 Universitas; No. 34 (2021): (March 2021- August 2021): Fake News, Communication and Politics; 155-176 Universitas; Núm. 34 (2021): (marzo 2021- agosto 2021): Fake News, comunicación y política; 155-176 1390-8634 1390-3837 10.17163/uni.n34 spa eng https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07/4343 https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07/4381 https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07/4382 https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07/4396 Derechos de autor 2021 Universidad Politénica Salesiana |
| spellingShingle | Koziner, Nadia Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español |
| title | Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español |
| title_full | Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español |
| title_fullStr | Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español |
| title_short | Public interest or published interest? Argentine media regulation in economic press: Español |
| title_sort | public interest or published interest? argentine media regulation in economic press: español |
| url | https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/34.2021.07 |