Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaUnsolved controversy in the theory of systems
This analysis brings to the fore the controversy between the linear and nonlinear aspect of systemic thinking, highlighting the radical discrepancy between Edgar Morin and Mario Bunge. While one opts for a sustained approach in what they call “nonlinear logic”, the other takes the logic initiated by...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Revistas |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador)
2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/26.2017.09 |
| _version_ | 1782340235546329088 |
|---|---|
| author | Cabrera Tenecela, Homero Patricio |
| author_facet | Cabrera Tenecela, Homero Patricio |
| author_sort | Cabrera Tenecela, Homero Patricio |
| collection | Revista |
| description | This analysis brings to the fore the controversy between the linear and nonlinear aspect of systemic thinking, highlighting the radical discrepancy between Edgar Morin and Mario Bunge. While one opts for a sustained approach in what they call “nonlinear logic”, the other takes the logic initiated by Aristotle as the most appropriate for systemic thinking. Two epistemological thesis that hardly envision a point of convergence, especially regarding data modeling, daily activity of social scientist. On the one hand, it emphasizes noted that the nonlinear modeling has a flexibility capable of generating valid models that match the complexity, from a fundamentally qualitative point; and, on the contrary, it is judged as a weakness abuse nonlinear modeling considering that most facts are linear and suitable for quantification. |
| format | Revistas |
| id | oai:revistas.ups.edu.ec:article-1537 |
| institution | Universitas |
| language | Español |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador) |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:revistas.ups.edu.ec:article-15372019-11-29T19:16:17Z Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems Controversia irresuelta en la teoría de sistemas Cabrera Tenecela, Homero Patricio Pensamiento complejo lógica no lineal pensamiento sistémico Linear logic nonlinear logic systems thinking This analysis brings to the fore the controversy between the linear and nonlinear aspect of systemic thinking, highlighting the radical discrepancy between Edgar Morin and Mario Bunge. While one opts for a sustained approach in what they call “nonlinear logic”, the other takes the logic initiated by Aristotle as the most appropriate for systemic thinking. Two epistemological thesis that hardly envision a point of convergence, especially regarding data modeling, daily activity of social scientist. On the one hand, it emphasizes noted that the nonlinear modeling has a flexibility capable of generating valid models that match the complexity, from a fundamentally qualitative point; and, on the contrary, it is judged as a weakness abuse nonlinear modeling considering that most facts are linear and suitable for quantification. El presente análisis pone sobre el tapete la controversia entre la vertiente lineal y la no lineal del pensamiento sistémico emergentista, destacándose la radical discrepancia entre Edgar Morin y Mario Bunge. Mientras el uno se decanta por una propuesta sostenida en lo que denominan “lógica no lineal”, el otro adopta la lógica iniciada por Aristóteles como la más apropiada para el pensamiento sistémico. Dos tesis epistemológicas que difícilmente avizoran un punto de convergencia, especialmente en lo que respecta la modelación de datos, actividad cotidiana del científico social contemporáneo. Por un lado, se hace hincapié en señalar que la modelación no lineal tiene una flexibilidad capaz de generar modelos válidos que responden a la complejidad, desde una óptica fundamentalmente cualitativa; y, por el contrario, se juzga como una debilidad abusar de la modelación no lineal considerando que la mayoría de hechos se consideran lineales e idóneos para la cuantificación. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador) 2017-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/octet-stream https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/26.2017.09 10.17163/uni.n26.2017.09 Universitas; No. 26: (January-June 2017); 221-234 Universitas; Núm. 26: (enero-junio 2017); 221-234 1390-8634 1390-3837 10.17163/uni.n26 spa https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/26.2017.09/1434 https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/26.2017.09/1924 https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/26.2017.09/1925 Derechos de autor 2017 Universidad Politénica Salesiana |
| spellingShingle | Cabrera Tenecela, Homero Patricio Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| title | Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| title_full | Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| title_fullStr | Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| title_short | Unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| title_sort | unsolved controversy in the theory of systems |
| url | https://universitas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/universitas/article/view/26.2017.09 |