Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaDevelopment economics and the structuralist school
Early structuralism had strong economic implications in development policies until 1970, particularity in Latin America. Its theorical roots can be traced back to classical economists, which follow. a deep study of structures and institutions of the economy at hand. The analysis draw on fundamental...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Revistas |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Cartagena
2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/389 |
| _version_ | 1782340287744442368 |
|---|---|
| author | Escobar-Espinoza, Andrés |
| author_facet | Escobar-Espinoza, Andrés |
| author_sort | Escobar-Espinoza, Andrés |
| collection | Revista |
| description | Early structuralism had strong economic implications in development policies until 1970, particularity in Latin America. Its theorical roots can be traced back to classical economists, which follow. a deep study of structures and institutions of the economy at hand. The analysis draw on fundamentals in development economics, Such as income distribution, surplus, structural change over time, and the distinction between productive/non productive sectors, the role of money in a 'real' economy, just to mention a few: its proposals, as part of a diverse set of the heterodox thinking, have been ignored by orthodox theorists. Sorting wisely among different perspectives requires a clearly diagnostic approach that distinguishes that the binding constraints growth are singular room setting to setting. In the current era of globalization and financial deepening, these proposals along their coherent framework represent a valid alternative to understand the economic bottlenecks that developing countries face, and better inform: policy-makers, to enhance inclusive economic growth towards social and economic prosperityKey Words: development, neo-structuralism, structuralism. |
| format | Revistas |
| id | oai:revistas.unicartagena.edu.co:article-389 |
| institution | Revista Panorama Económico |
| language | Español |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publisher | Universidad de Cartagena |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:revistas.unicartagena.edu.co:article-3892020-04-02T08:56:26Z Development economics and the structuralist school Desarrollo económico y la escuela estructuralista Escobar-Espinoza, Andrés Early structuralism had strong economic implications in development policies until 1970, particularity in Latin America. Its theorical roots can be traced back to classical economists, which follow. a deep study of structures and institutions of the economy at hand. The analysis draw on fundamentals in development economics, Such as income distribution, surplus, structural change over time, and the distinction between productive/non productive sectors, the role of money in a 'real' economy, just to mention a few: its proposals, as part of a diverse set of the heterodox thinking, have been ignored by orthodox theorists. Sorting wisely among different perspectives requires a clearly diagnostic approach that distinguishes that the binding constraints growth are singular room setting to setting. In the current era of globalization and financial deepening, these proposals along their coherent framework represent a valid alternative to understand the economic bottlenecks that developing countries face, and better inform: policy-makers, to enhance inclusive economic growth towards social and economic prosperityKey Words: development, neo-structuralism, structuralism. El estructuralismo tuvo importantes implicaciones en las políticas de desarrollo de América Latina hasta los años 1970s. Sus antecedentes teóricos se remontan a economistas clásicos, quienes estudiaron a fondo la estructura e instituciones de la economía en cuestión. El análisis se basa en fundamentales de la economía del desarrollo, como ser, distribución del ingreso, cambio estructural, excedentes, la distinción de sectores productivos y no-productivos, y el rol del dinero en la economía "real", por mencionar algunos. Sus nuevas propuestas, como parte integral de la denominada economía moderna y de la heterodoxia han sido ignoradas por la mainstream. Distinguir sabiamente entre las diferentes perspectivas requiere un enfoque de diagnóstico que establezca claramente que las restricciones del crecimiento son particulares para cada economía. En la actual era de globalización y financiarizacion de la economía, estas propuestas junto con su marco conceptual representan una alternativa válida para comprender las limitaciones que enfrentan los países en desarrollo e informar adecuadamente a los policy makers, y así poder conseguir un crecimiento económico inclusivo que permita alcanzar la prosperidad económica y social.Palabras Clave: Economía del Desarrollo, Neo-estructuralismo, Estructuralismo. Universidad de Cartagena 2010-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/389 10.32997/2463-0470-vol.18-num.18-2010-389 Panorama Económico Journal; Vol. 18 (2010); 13-45 Panorama Económico; Vol. 18 (2010); 13-45 Panorama Económico; v. 18 (2010); 13-45 2463-0470 0122-8900 10.32997/2463-0470-vol.18-num.18-2010 spa https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/389/341 /*ref*/Harberger A C. Interview With Arnold Harberger: Sound Policies Can Free Up Natural Forces Of Growth. International Monetary Fund. Imf Survey, 2003. 213-216. /*ref*/Vaggi G. Historical Antecedents Of Development Economics. In International Handbook Of Development Economics, Eds. A K. Dutt And J. Ros. London: Edward EIgar. 2008. /*ref*/Mun T. England's Treasure By Forraign Trade. Thomas Clark, London, 1664. New York 1986: Augustus M. Kelley Reprints. 1623. /*ref*/Aspromourgus T. On The Origins Of Classical Economics: Distribution And Value From William Petty To Adam Smith. London: Routledge. 1996. /*ref*/Quesnay F. Analysis Of The Aritrnethical Formula Of The Tableu Economique, In Meek, Allen And Unwin. London 1962. /*ref*/Smith A An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations, Wn, Edited By R.H. Campbell, AS. Skinner And W.B. Todd. Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, 1976. /*ref*/Stathakis G & Vaggi G. Economic Development And Social Change: The Classical View And The Moderns, In Economic Development And Social Change - Historical Roots And Modern Perspectives, Eds. G. Vaggi And G. Stathakis. London: Routledge. 2006. /*ref*/Rostow W.W. Theorists Of Economic Growth From David Hume To The Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1990. /*ref*/Schumpeter J. The Theory Of Economic Development, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1934. /*ref*/Fagerberg J. Innovation: A Guide To The Literature, In Oxford Hand- book Of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, And R. Nelson (Eds.). 2006,1-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. /*ref*/Dutt A The Political Economy Of Development: An Introductio, In AK. Dutt (Ed.), In The Political Economy Of Development, Cheltenham, Uk: Edward Elgar. 2002. /*ref*/Ros J. Development Theory And The Economics Of Growth, Ann Harbor, Mi: The University Of Michigan Press. 2000. /*ref*/Rosenstein-Rodan P. N. Problems Of Industrialization In Eastern And South-Eastern Europe, Economic Journal. 1943,53: 201-211. /*ref*/Nurkse R. Problems Of Capital Formation In Underdeveloped Countries. New York: Oxford University Press. 1953. /*ref*/Lewis A Economic Development With Unlimited Resources Of Labor. Manchester School. 1954, 22: 139-91. /*ref*/Hirschman A O. The Strategy Of Economic Development, New York: Norton.1958. /*ref*/Palma G. Latin America During The Second Half Of The Twentieth Century: From The 'Age Of Extremes' To The Age Of 'End-Of-History' Uniformity, In Rethinking Development Economics, H.J. Chang (Ed.). London: Anthem Press. 2004. /*ref*/Singer H. The Distribution Of Gains Between Investing And Borrowing Countries, American Economic Review. 1950,11(2). /*ref*/Prebisch R. International Trade And Payments In An Era Of Coexistence: Commercial Policy In Underdeveloped Countries. The American Economic Review. 1959,49 (2): 251-273. /*ref*/Myrdal G. Economic Theory And Under-Developed Regions. London: Duckworth. 1957. /*ref*/Little 1., Scitovsky T. And Scott M. Industry And Trade In Some Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1970. /*ref*/Posner M. V. International Trade And Technical Change, Oxford Economic Papers. 1961,13: 323-341. /*ref*/Fagerberg J. A Technology Gap Approach To Why Growth Rates Differ, Research Policy. 1987, 16: 87-99. /*ref*/Fagerberg J. Why Growth Rates Differ, In Technical Change And Economic Theory, Dosi Et Al., 1988:432-457. London: Francis Pinter. 1988. /*ref*/Fagerberg J And Verspagen B. Technology-Gaps, Innovation-Diffusion And Transformation: An Evolutionary Interpretation, Research Policy. 2002,31: 1291-1304. /*ref*/Fagerberg J. Is There A Large-Country Advantage In High-Tech?, Nupi Working Paper No. 526, Norwegian Institute Of International Affairs, Oslo. 1995. /*ref*/Dutt AK. And Ros J. Development Economics And Structuralist Economics: Essays In Honor Of Lance Taylor. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. 2003. /*ref*/Bardhan P. The New Institutional Economics And Development Theory: A Brief Critical Assessment. World Development, Elsevier. 1988. 17 (9): 1389-1395. /*ref*/Nurkse R. Balanced Growth On Static Assumptions. Economic [ourna1. 1956, 66 (262): 365-367. /*ref*/N oyola Vasquez J. El Desarrollo Económico Y La Inflación En México Y Otros Paises Latinoamericanos, Investigación Económica. 1956, 16 (4): 603-648. /*ref*/Gibson B. An Essay On Late Structuralism, In Development Economics And Structuralist Macroeconomics: Essays In Honor Of Lance Taylor, A. K. Dutt And J. Ross (Eds.). 2003: 53-76. Cheltenham: Edward EIgar. /*ref*/Chang H. J. Kicking Away The Ladder: Development Strategy In Development Perspective. London: Anthem Press. 2002. /*ref*/Levi-Strauss C. Structuralism And Ecology, Barnard Alumnae Magazine. 1972, 234-241. /*ref*/Piaget J. Structuralism. New York: Harper & Row. 1970. /*ref*/Jameson F. The Ideologies Of Theory: Essays 1971-1986. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press. 1988. /*ref*/Foucault M. The Archeology Of Knowledge, (A. M. Sheridan-Smith Translation). London: Tavistock. 1972. /*ref*/Chenery H. B. The Structuralist Approach To Development Policy. The American Economic Review Aer. 1975, 65 (2),310-316. /*ref*/Little 1. Economic Development - Theory. Policy And International Relations, New York: Basic Books. 1982. /*ref*/Arndt H. W. The Origins Of Structuralism, World Development. 1985, 13 (2): 151-159. /*ref*/Pigou Arthur C. The Economics Of Welfare. London: Macmillan And CO.1920. /*ref*/Sraffa P. The Laws Of Returns Under Competitive Conditions, The Economic Journa1. 1926, 36 (144): 535-550. /*ref*/Chamberlin, E. Duopoly: Values Where Sellers Are Few, Quarterly Journal Of Economics. 1929. /*ref*/Robinson J. The Economics Of Imperfect Competition. Palgrave Macmillan. 1933. /*ref*/Myrdal G. Asian Drama: An Inquiry Into The Poverty Of Nations. 1968. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers (2008). /*ref*/Arndt H. W. The Economic Lessons Of The Nineteen-Thirties. London: Oxford University Press. 1944. /*ref*/Campos R. De O. Two Views Of Inflation In Latin America, In Latin American Issues, Ed. Hirschman A. O. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.1961. /*ref*/Campos. Campos, R.O. [1964] 1967. Economic Development And Inflation, With Special Reference To Latin America. In Reflections On Latin American Development. Austin: University Of Texas Press. 1964. /*ref*/Furtado C. Capital Formation And Economic Development Translated By J. Cairncross (1954). International Economic Papers. 1952,4: 124-144. /*ref*/Furtado C. A Economia Brasileira (The Brazilian Economy) Rio: A Noite.1954. /*ref*/Boianovsky M. Furtado And The Structuralist-Monetarist Debate On Economic Stabilization In Latin America, Unpublished Paper, Universidade De Brasilia. 2009. /*ref*/Kalecki M. El Problema Del Financiamiento Del Desarrollo Económico, El Trimestre Económico. 1955,21(4). /*ref*/Aujac H. Inflation As The Monetary Consequence Of The Behavior Of Social Groups. International Economic Papers. 1954,4: 109-123. /*ref*/Furtado C. Development And Underdevelopment. Translated By R. Aguiar And E. Drysdale (1964). Berkeley: University Of California Press. 1961. /*ref*/Prebisch R. Five Stages In My Thinking On Development, In G. M. Meier And D. Seers (Eds.) Pioneers In Development. Oxford: University Press, For The World Bank. 1984. /*ref*/Craven C. A Transformation Problem: Monetarism To Structuralism In The Economic Cornmission For Latin America, History Of Political Economy. 1994,26: 1-19. /*ref*/Furtado C. A Fantasia Organizada (Organized Fantasy). Rio: Paz E Terra. 1985. /*ref*/Toye J. And Toye R. The Un And Global Political Economy - Trade, Finance, And Development, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2004. /*ref*/Diaz-Alejandro C. Exchange-Rate Devaluation In A Semi-Industrialized Country: The Experience Of Argentina 1955-1961. Cambridge, Mass: Mcgraw-Hill.1965. /*ref*/Noyola Vasquez J. Inflación Y Desarrollo En Chile, Unpublished Type-script, Cepal Archives, Santiago. 1955a. /*ref*/Canavese A. The Structuralist Explanation In The Theory Of Inflation. World Development. 1982, 10: 253-29. /*ref*/Furtado C. Development And Stagnation In Latin America: A Structuralist Approach. Studies In Comparative International Development. 1965,1: 159-175. /*ref*/Balogh T. Economic Policy And The Price System, Economic Bulletin For Latin America, 1962, 6 (1): 41-53. /*ref*/Chenery H. B. Development Policies And Programmes", Economic Bulletin For Latin America. 1958,3 (1): 51-77. /*ref*/Seers D. A Theory Of Inflation And Growth In Underdeveloped Economies Based On The Experience Of Latin America, Oxford Economic Papers. 1962,14 (2): 173-195. /*ref*/Prebisch R. El falso dilema entre desarrollo económico y estabilidad monetaria, Boletín Económico de América Latina. 1961,6 (1): 1-26. /*ref*/Hirschman A. O. De La Economía A La Política Y Mas Allá. Ensayos De Penetración Y Superación De Fronteras. México: F.C.E., (1978).1981. /*ref*/Rodrik D. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review Of The World Bank's Economic Growth In The 1990s: Learning From A Decade Of Reform, Journal Of Economic Literature. 2006,44; December: 973-987. /*ref*/Sunkel O. En Busca Del Desarrollo Perdido, Problemas Del Desarrollo (Revista Latinoamericana De Economia). 2006,37 (147): 13-32. /*ref*/Easterly W. En Busca Del Crecimiento: Andanzas Y Tribulaciones De Los Economistas Del Desarrollo, Barcelona: Antoni Bosch. 2003. /*ref*/Sen A. Development As Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002 71. Hoff C And Stiglitz J. La Teoría Económica Moderna Y El Desarrollo, En G. Meier And J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Fronteras De La Economia Del Desarrollo: El Futuro En Perspectiva Histórica. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. 2002. 72. Giraud G And Renouard C. Vingt Propositions Pour Réformer Le Capitalisme, Paris: Flammarion. 2009. /*ref*/Taylor L. Estabilización Y Crecimiento En Los Países En Desarrollo: Un Enfoque Estructuralista. México D.F.: Fondo De Cultura Económica. 1992. /*ref*/Taylor L. Structuralist Macroeconomics: Applicable Models For The Third World. New York: Basic Books. 1983. /*ref*/Gibson B, Lustig N And Taylor L. Sam's Impact On Income Distribution, In Food Policy In Mexico, G. Esteva And J. Austin (Eds). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1986. /*ref*/Foley D And Taylor L. A Heterodox Growth And Distributional Model, Paper Presented At The International Conference On "Economic Growth And Distribution: On The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations", Lucca, Italy. 2004, June: 16-18. /*ref*/Taylor, L. (1990a), "Structuralist Cge Models, In Taylor L. (Ed.), 50cially Relevant Policy Analysis, Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press. /*ref*/Baghirathan R, Taylor L And Rada C. Structuralist Economics: Worldly Philosophers, Models, And Methodology. Social Research. 2004, 71(2): 305-326. /*ref*/Sanchez-Ancochea D. Anglo-Saxon Structuralismversus Latin American Structuralism: Latin American Development Thought In Comparative Perspective. Paper Delivered At The Conference Of The Eastern Economic Association, New York. 2005, March: 4-6. /*ref*/Stifel D.C. And Thorbecke E. A Dual-Dual Cge Model Of An Archetype African Economy: Trade Reform, Migration, And Poverty. Journal Of Policy Modelling. 2003, 25 (3): 207-235. /*ref*/Bhaduri A And Marglin S.A. Unemployment And The Real Wages: The Economic Basis For Contesting Political Ideologies, Cambridge Journal Of Economics. 1990, 14 (December): 375-393. /*ref*/Barbosa-Filho N.H. And Taylor L. Distributive And Demand Cycles In The Us Economy: A Structuralist Goodwin Model. The Schwartz Center Working Paper Series 2003: (3) . /*ref*/Barbosa-Filho N.H A Simple Model Of Demand-Led Growth And Income Distribution, Paper Submitted To The Xxxii Meetings Of Anpec, Joao Pessoa, Brazil, December 6-10. /*ref*/Taylor L. Macro Constraints On India' s Economic Growth, In Taylor L. (Ed.), Socially Relevant Policy Analysis. Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press. 1990b. /*ref*/Bhaduri A. Structural Change And Economic Development: On The Relative Roles Of Effective Demand And The Price Mechanism In A Dual Economy, In Chang HJ. (Ed.), Rethinking Development Economics, London: Anthem Press. 2003. /*ref*/Khan HA. Poverty Impact Of Trade Liberalization In A Dual-Dual Cge Model: Illustrations For South Asia. Asian Development Bank Institute.2005. /*ref*/Ranis G And Stewart F. V-Goods And The Role Of Informal Sector In Development, Economic Development And Cultural Change. 1999,47 (2): 259-288. /*ref*/Blecker R.A And Seguino S. Macroeconomic Effects Of Reducing Gender Wage Inequality In An Export-Oriented, Semi-Industrialized Econo- my, Review Of Development Economics. 2002,6 (1): 103-119. /*ref*/Wuyts M. Informal Economy, Wage Goods And Accumulation Under Structural Adjustrnent: Theoretical Reflections Based On The Tanzanian Perspective. Cambridge Journal Of Economics. 2001, 25(3): 417-438. /*ref*/Akyuz Y And Gore C. African Economic Development In A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge Journal Of Economics. 2001,25 (3): 265-288. /*ref*/Love L. J. The Rise And Decline Of Economic Structuralism In Latin America: New Dimensions. Latin American Research Review. 2005, 40 (3): 100-125. /*ref*/Ferrari E. Structuralist Models: A Critical Review, Unpublished Paper, Universita Degli Studi Di Firenze. 2006. /*ref*/Ocampo J.A. And Taylor L. Trade Liberalization In Developing Economies: Modest Benefits But Problems With Productivity Growth, Macro Prices, And Income Distribution. The Economic Journal. 1998, 108(3): 1523-1546. /*ref*/Gunter B.G., Talor L. And Yeldan E. Analyzing Macro-Poverty Link- ages Of External Liberalization: Gaps, Achievements, And Alternatives. Development Policy Review. 2005, 23(3): 285-298. /*ref*/Thissen M. Financial Cge Models: Two Decades Of Research. University Of Groningen, Research Institute Som (Systems, Organizations, And Management). Research Paper 99c26. 1999. /*ref*/Backus D, Brainard W, Smith G And Tobin J. A Model Of US. Financial And Nonfinancial Economic Behavior. Journal Of Money, Credit, And Banking. 1980, 12(2): 259-293 /*ref*/Dervis K, De Melo J And Robinson S. General Equilibrium Models For Development Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1983. /*ref*/Bell C And Srinivasan T. N. On The Uses And Abuses Of Economy wide Models In Development Planning Analysis, In M. Syrquin, L. Taylor And L. E. Westphal (Eds.), Economic Structure And Performance, New York: Academic Press. 1984. /*ref*/Taylor L, Sarkar H, Rattso J. Macroeconomic Adjustment In A Computable General Equilibrium Model For India, In M. Syrquim, L. Taylor., And L.E. Westphal (Eds.), Economic Structure And Performance. New York: Academic Press. 1984. /*ref*/Easterly W. Portfolio Effects In A Cge Model: Devaluation In A Dollarized Economy, In Taylor L. (Ed.), Socially Relevant Policy Analysis, Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press. 1990. /*ref*/RosenweigJ.A. And Taylor L. Devaluation, Capital Flows, And Crowding-Out: A Cge Model With Portfolio Choice For Thailand, In Taylor L. (Ed.), Socially Relevant Policy Analysis, Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press. 1990. /*ref*/Bourguignon F, Branson W And De Melo J. Macroeconomic Adjustment And Income Distribution: A Macro-Micro Simulation Model, Oecd Development Centre, Technical Papers. Paris. 1989, (1). /*ref*/Jemio L.e. Debt, Crisis, And Reform In Bolivia: Biting The Bullet. BasingstokejNew Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 2001. /*ref*/Lay J, R. Thiele And M. Wiebelt. Pro-Poor Growth In Bolivia: Accounting For External Shocks And Policy Reforms. Kiel Working Paper No. 1231. Kiel Institute For World Economics. Kiel. 2004. /*ref*/Khan H.A. Using Macroeconomic Computable General Equilibrium Models For Assessing Poverty Impact Of Structural Adjustment Policies, Asian Development Bank Institute, Discussion Paper No. 12. 2004. /*ref*/Schweickert R, R. Thiele And M. Wiebelt. Exchange Rate Policy In A Dollarized Economy: A Cge Analysis For Bolivia. Kiel Working Paper No. 1255. Kiel Institute For World Economics. Kiel. 2005. /*ref*/Yeldan A, Voyvoda E And Telli e. Macroeconomics Of Twin-Targeting In Turkey: Analytics Of A Financial Cge Model, Political Economy Research Institute, University Of Massachusetts, Arnherst. 2007. /*ref*/Shoven J. B. And Whalley J. Applied General-Equilibrium Models Of Taxation And International Trade: An Introduction And Survey. Journal Of Economic Literature. 1984, 22:1007-1051. Derechos de autor 2015 Panorama Económico |
| spellingShingle | Escobar-Espinoza, Andrés Development economics and the structuralist school |
| title | Development economics and the structuralist school |
| title_full | Development economics and the structuralist school |
| title_fullStr | Development economics and the structuralist school |
| title_full_unstemmed | Development economics and the structuralist school |
| title_short | Development economics and the structuralist school |
| title_sort | development economics and the structuralist school |
| url | https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/389 |