Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.

The article seeks to rescue and reformulate a way of thinking about epistemological problems in economics, specifically around the debate on the nature of money. The two antagonistic conceptions about the nature of money are presented; that of money-merchandise and that of money-debt. Then Tony Laws...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Guevara Castañeda, Camilo Andrés
Formato: Revistas
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Cartagena 2019
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2624
_version_ 1782340332109692928
author Guevara Castañeda, Camilo Andrés
author_facet Guevara Castañeda, Camilo Andrés
author_sort Guevara Castañeda, Camilo Andrés
collection Revista
description The article seeks to rescue and reformulate a way of thinking about epistemological problems in economics, specifically around the debate on the nature of money. The two antagonistic conceptions about the nature of money are presented; that of money-merchandise and that of money-debt. Then Tony Lawson's ontological proposal is presented that articulates the two conceptions: money is not itself merchandise or debt, but these forms are social positions of money. Some criticisms of this proposal are collected. Finally, within the spirit of trends such as phenomenology and pragmatism, a critical anti-essentialism is proposed. It is argued in favor of money as a social relationship, for the worlds that open and the consequences that occur.
format Revistas
id oai:revistas.unicartagena.edu.co:article-2624
institution Revista Panorama Económico
language Español
publishDate 2019
publisher Universidad de Cartagena
record_format ojs
spelling oai:revistas.unicartagena.edu.co:article-26242021-10-25T17:41:28Z Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective. Pensando la naturaleza de la moneda desde una perspectiva crítica posfundacional. Guevara Castañeda, Camilo Andrés Nature of currency Merchandise money Debt money Social positioning Naturaleza de la moneda Dinero mercancía Dinero deuda Posicionamiento social The article seeks to rescue and reformulate a way of thinking about epistemological problems in economics, specifically around the debate on the nature of money. The two antagonistic conceptions about the nature of money are presented; that of money-merchandise and that of money-debt. Then Tony Lawson's ontological proposal is presented that articulates the two conceptions: money is not itself merchandise or debt, but these forms are social positions of money. Some criticisms of this proposal are collected. Finally, within the spirit of trends such as phenomenology and pragmatism, a critical anti-essentialism is proposed. It is argued in favor of money as a social relationship, for the worlds that open and the consequences that occur. El artículo busca rescatar y reformular una forma de pensar problemas epistemológicos en economía, específicamente en torno al debate de la naturaleza del dinero. Se presentan las dos concepciones antagónicas sobre la naturaleza del dinero; la del dinero-mercancía y la del dinero-deuda. Después se presenta la propuesta ontológica de Tony Lawson que articula las dos concepciones: el dinero no es en sí mismo mercancía o deuda, sino que estas formas son posicionamientos sociales del dinero. Se recogen algunas críticas a esta propuesta. Por último, dentro del espíritu de corrientes como la fenomenología y el pragmatismo, se propone un antiesencialismo crítico. Se argumenta a favor del dinero como relación social, por los mundos que se abren y las consecuencias que se producen. Universidad de Cartagena 2019-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2624 10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.1-2019-2624 Panorama Económico Journal; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 208-227 Panorama Económico; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2019); 208-227 Panorama Económico; v. 27 n. 1 (2019); 208-227 2463-0470 0122-8900 10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.1-2019 spa https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2624/2201 /*ref*/Aglietta, M., & Orleán, A. (1988). La violencia de la moneda. Mexico: Siglo XXI. /*ref*/Aglietta, M., Ponsot, J.-F., & Ould Ahmed, P. (2016). Monnaie entre dettes et souveraineté. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob. /*ref*/Baskhar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. New York: Routledge. /*ref*/Colander, D. (2000). The death of neoclassical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought Volume 22, Issue 2, 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710050025330 /*ref*/Davidson, P. (1972). Money and the real world. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230209 /*ref*/Davidson, P. (2007). Money And Keynes. En P. Arestis, & M. Sawyer, A hanbook of alternative monetary economics (págs. 139-152). Chentelham: Edward Elgar. /*ref*/Dequech, D. (2013). Is money a convention and/or a creature of the state? the convention of the acceptability, the state, contracts and taxes. Journal of Post Keynesians Economics, Vol 36 No2. 251251-275. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477360204 /*ref*/Dodd, N. (2014). The social life of money. New Jersey: Princeton Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400852048 /*ref*/Dupuy, J.-P. (2012). L'Avenir de l'économie: Sortir de l'écomystification. Paris: Flammarion. /*ref*/Escobar-Espinoza, A., & Angulo-Pico, G. (2015). Panorama Economico in the context of the international visibility of scientific journals. Panorama Económico, 23, 11-13. https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.23-num.1-2015-1733 /*ref*/Escobar-Espinoza, A., Guevara-Castañeda, D., & Uribe-Veloza, M. (2017). Modelos Computacionales y Análisis de la Política Económica en Colombia. Panorama Económico, 25(4), 535-558. https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.25-num.4-2017-2088 /*ref*/Felipe, J. (2009). Inclusive Growth, Full Employment, and Structural Change: Implications and Policies for Developing Asia. Cambridge: Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843313557 /*ref*/Feyerabend, P. (1978). La ciencia en una sociedad libre. México: Siglo XXI. /*ref*/Fontana, G. (2004). Hicks on monetary theory and history: Money as endogenous money. Cambridge journal of economics, 28, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/28.1.73 /*ref*/Girard, R. (1982). La violencia y lo sagrado. Barcelona: Anagrama. /*ref*/Goodhart, C. (1998). The two concepts of money: implications for the analysis of optimal currency areas. european journal of political economy. Vol 14, 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(98)00015-9 /*ref*/Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House Publishing. /*ref*/Hahn, F. (1965). On some problems of proving the existence of an equilibrium in a monetary economy. En F. Hahn , & F. Brechling, The Theory Of interest Rates (págs. 126-135).Macmillan. /*ref*/Heidegger, M. (2005). Que significa pensar? Madrid: Trotta. /*ref*/Ingham, G. (2004). Nature Of Money. London: Routledge. /*ref*/Ingham, G. (2017). A critique of Lawson's 'Social positioning and the nature of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2017, 1-14. /*ref*/Jevons, S. (1875). Money and the mechanism of exchange. New York: Cosimo Classics. /*ref*/Jullien, F. (2008). Un sabio no tiene ideas. Madrid: Siruela. /*ref*/Kalecki, M. (1943). Aspectos políticos del pleno empleo. Political Quarterly, vol 14, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1943.tb01016.x /*ref*/Keen, S. (2011). Debunking economics. Madrid: Cápitan Swing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350250963 /*ref*/Lapavitsas, C. (2003). Social Foundations of Markets, Money and Credit. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496701 /*ref*/Lavoie, M. (2014). Post-keynesian economics. London: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783475827 /*ref*/Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203195390 /*ref*/Lawson, T. (2016). Social positioning and the nature of money. Cambridge Journal of economics, 40, 961-996. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew006 /*ref*/Marchart, O. (2009). El pensamiento político posfundacionalista. Bogotá: Fondo de cultura económica. /*ref*/Martin, F. (2013). Money. The Unauthorised Biography. London: Vintage Books. /*ref*/Marx, K. (1990). Tesis Sobre Feuerbach. Madrid: Grijalbo. /*ref*/Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1999). El arbol del conocimiento. Santiago de Chile: Lumen. /*ref*/Menger, C. (1892). On the Origin of Money. The Economic Journal, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2956146 /*ref*/Mirowski, P., & Nik-Khah, E. (2017). The knowledge we have lost with information. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270056.001.0001 /*ref*/Moreno, A. (2014). Política monetaria y distribución funcional del ingreso. Documento escuela de economía No. 50, 1-39. /*ref*/Orléan, A. (2011). L'Empire de la valeur. Refonder l'économie. París: Seuil. /*ref*/Parguez, A., & Seccareccia, M. (1999). Credit theory: monetary circuit approach. En J. Smithin, What is money? (págs. 101-123). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203072691.ch5 /*ref*/Pettifor, A. (2017). The production of money: How to break the power of banks. New York: Verso. Rochon, L.-P. (2017). Rethinking monetary policy. En L.-P. Rochon, & S. Rossi, A modern guide for rethinking economics (págs. 120-130). London: Edward Elgar. /*ref*/Sala-i-Martin, X. (2015). Economía en colores. Barcelona: Conecta. /*ref*/Schumpeter, J. (1988). Historia del analisis económico. Madrid: Ariel. /*ref*/Searle, J. (2010). Creando el mundo social. La estructura de la civilización humana. Madrid: Paidos. /*ref*/Simmel, G. (2014). Filosofía del dinero. Madrid: Capitán swing. /*ref*/Smithin, J. (2013). Requirements of a Philosophy of Money And Finance. En J. Pixley et al., Financial Crises and the Nature of Capitalist Money (págs. 19-31). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302953_2 /*ref*/Tsilipakos, L. (2012). The Poverty of Ontological Reasoning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00486.x /*ref*/Vergnhanini, R., & De Conti, B. (2017). Modern Monetary Theory: a criticism from the periphery. Brazilian keynesian review. https://doi.org/10.33834/bkr.v3i2.115 /*ref*/Vergara-De la Ossa, R., Londoño-Vega, C., Pérez-Benítez, N., & Torres-Castellar, R. (2015). La adopción de las Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera en Colombia. Panorama Económico, 23, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.23-num.1-2015-1382 /*ref*/Weber, M. (2006). Economía y sociedad. México: Fondo de cultura económica. /*ref*/Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust. New York: Free Press. /*ref*/Zelizer, V. (2011). El significado social del dinero. Buenos Aires: FCE. /*ref*/Zelmanovitz, L. (2016). The ontology and function of money. The philosophical fundamentals of monetary institutions. Lanham: Lexington books. Derechos de autor 2019 Panorama Económico https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle Guevara Castañeda, Camilo Andrés
Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
title Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
title_full Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
title_fullStr Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
title_full_unstemmed Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
title_short Thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
title_sort thinking about the nature of currency from a post-foundation critical perspective.
url https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2624