| Sumario: | The Camisea case shows that decisions to invest more or less in the social and environmental aspects mega-projects end up affecting the vulnerable populations. One detailed revision of the impacts caused throughout the layout of gas pipeline shows the inefficiency of current schemes of supervision applied by the I.A.D.B., the OSINERG and the Ministry of Energy and Mines among others. The paper reviews the crucial contribution of the organized civil society, in spite of its ideological and practical division. Detailed information of human rights affected confirm the learned lesson that suggests the need to create in the I.A.D.B. an environmental and social auditor of the project it finances, that reports to a tripartite council formed by civil society, indigenous peoples and multilateral banks representatives.
|
|---|
Biblioteca Digital de Vanguardia