About citizenship(s)
This is a reflection on the central topic of the previous edition, especially on the proposal presented by its coordinators. The author recognizes the contribution represented by an analysis of the “field of intimacy” in citizenship work and practices. However, she insists on the need to be more con...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Revistas |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador
2010
|
Acceso en línea: | https://iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec/index.php/iconos/article/view/399 |
_version_ | 1802410565131304960 |
---|---|
author | Wappenstein, Susana |
author_facet | Wappenstein, Susana |
author_sort | Wappenstein, Susana |
collection | Revista |
description | This is a reflection on the central topic of the previous edition, especially on the proposal presented by its coordinators. The author recognizes the contribution represented by an analysis of the “field of intimacy” in citizenship work and practices. However, she insists on the need to be more concrete as regards the specificity of the “citizenship” category in order to understand progress and limitations in processes of struggle, proposals and the creation of a sexual citizenship. |
format | Revistas |
id | iconos-article-399 |
institution | Íconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales |
language | Español |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | iconos-article-3992024-04-23T18:16:48Z About citizenship(s) Sobre ciudadanía(s) Wappenstein, Susana ciudadanía sexualidad diferencia citizenship sexuality difference This is a reflection on the central topic of the previous edition, especially on the proposal presented by its coordinators. The author recognizes the contribution represented by an analysis of the “field of intimacy” in citizenship work and practices. However, she insists on the need to be more concrete as regards the specificity of the “citizenship” category in order to understand progress and limitations in processes of struggle, proposals and the creation of a sexual citizenship. Esta es una reflexión sobre el tema central de la pasada edición, en particular sobre la propuesta presentada por sus coordinadoras. La autora reconoce la contribución de incluir un análisis del “ámbito de la intimidad” en el trabajo y las prácticas sobre ciudadanía. Sin embargo, insiste en la necesidad de ser más específicos respecto a la categoría “ciudadanía” para entender los alcances y limitaciones en los procesos de luchas, planteamientos y conformación de una ciudadanía sexual. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador 2010-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Comentario invitado application/pdf https://iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec/index.php/iconos/article/view/399 10.17141/iconos.36.2010.399 Íconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Núm. 36 (2010): Dossier: Naturaleza y crisis del capitalismo; 109-111 Íconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales; n. 36 (2010): Dossier: Naturaleza y crisis del capitalismo; 109-111 Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales; No. 36 (2010): Dossier: Nature and crisis of capitalism ; 109-111 1390-8065 1390-1249 spa https://iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec/index.php/iconos/article/view/399/388 Derechos de autor 2010 Susana Wappenstein https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/deed.es_ES |
spellingShingle | Wappenstein, Susana About citizenship(s) |
title | About citizenship(s) |
title_full | About citizenship(s) |
title_fullStr | About citizenship(s) |
title_full_unstemmed | About citizenship(s) |
title_short | About citizenship(s) |
title_sort | about citizenship(s) |
url | https://iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec/index.php/iconos/article/view/399 |