Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaBiodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach
Biodiversity is crucial for the production of goods and services marketable and unmarketable. In Colombia, the biodiversity has contributed significantly to economic development and poverty alleviation. From a complete review of literature and a transdisciplinary approach, the following questions ar...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Revistas |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
2016
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/cpaz/article/view/10298 |
| _version_ | 1782345074033557504 |
|---|---|
| author | Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto |
| author_facet | Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto |
| author_sort | Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto |
| collection | Revista |
| description | Biodiversity is crucial for the production of goods and services marketable and unmarketable. In Colombia, the biodiversity has contributed significantly to economic development and poverty alleviation. From a complete review of literature and a transdisciplinary approach, the following questions are addressed: There is any relationship between better biodiversity level and the lower poverty levels? What factors determine the economic and social importance of biodiversity, not visible? Why our environmental public policies have not been implemented, or what happened to their expected impacts? Finally, some recommendations for addressing biodiversity relationship - poverty in Colombia. |
| format | Revistas |
| id | cpaz-article-10298 |
| institution | Ciudad Paz-ando (RCP) |
| language | Español |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | cpaz-article-102982019-02-04T17:16:40Z Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach Biodiversidad y pobreza en Colombia: un análisis desde el enfoque institucional Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto Biodiversidad Colombia Pobreza Crecimiento Económico transdisciplinar Enfoque Institucional Socioambiental biodiversity Colombia poverty economic development transdiciplinary institutional approach Biodiversity is crucial for the production of goods and services marketable and unmarketable. In Colombia, the biodiversity has contributed significantly to economic development and poverty alleviation. From a complete review of literature and a transdisciplinary approach, the following questions are addressed: There is any relationship between better biodiversity level and the lower poverty levels? What factors determine the economic and social importance of biodiversity, not visible? Why our environmental public policies have not been implemented, or what happened to their expected impacts? Finally, some recommendations for addressing biodiversity relationship - poverty in Colombia. La biodiversidad es crucial para la producción de bienes y servicios comercializables y no comercializables. En Colombia, la biodiversidad ha contribuido de forma importante al desarrollo económico y al alivio de la pobreza. A partir de una completa revisión de literatura y un enfoque transdisciplinar, se abordan las siguientes preguntas: ¿Por qué si un mejor estado de la biodiversidad disminuye la pobreza, su gestión no es una prioridad real en nuestro país? ¿Qué factores determinan que la importancia económica y social de la biodiversidad no sea visible? ¿Por qué nuestras políticas públicas ambientales no se han implementado, o que ha pasado con sus impactos esperados? Finalmente, se formulan algunas recomendaciones para abordar la relación biodiversidad – pobreza en Colombia en un potencial escenario de posconflicto. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas 2016-12-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/cpaz/article/view/10298 10.14483/udistrital.jour.cpaz.2016.2.a01 Ciudad Paz-Ando; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2016): Julio - diciembre. Territorio, medio ambiente y conflictividad; 11-24 Ciudad Paz-ando; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - diciembre. Territorio, medio ambiente y conflictividad; 11-24 2422-278X 2011-5253 spa https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/cpaz/article/view/10298/12151 /*ref*/Acemoglu, D; Gallego, R; Robinson, J.A. (2014). Institutions, human capital and development. Annual Reviews o f Economics. 6, 875-912. /*ref*/Acemoglu, D; García, C; Robinson, J.A. (2012). Finding El Dorado: Slavery and long-run development in Colombia. Journal of Comparative Economics. 40(4), 534-564. /*ref*/Acemoglu, D; Johnson, S; Robinson, J.A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review. 97(5), 1369-1401. /*ref*/Acemoglu, D; Robinson, J.A; Romero, D; Vargas, J.F. (2015). The perils of top-down state building: Evidence from Colombia's false positives. Unpublished. /*ref*/Acemoglu, D; Robinson, J.A. (2012). Why nations fail?. Nueva York, NY: Crown. pp. 635. /*ref*/Albers, H.J; Ferraro, P. (2006). The Economics of Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation in Developing Nations. In R. López and M. Toman (eds.), Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability, Oxford, Oxford University Press. /*ref*/Andrade, G. (2011). Estado del conocimiento de la biodiversidad en Colombia y sus amenazas. Consideraciones para fortalecer la interacción ciencia-política. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc, xxxv (137), 491-507. /*ref*/Arguello, R; Valderrama, D. (2015). Sectoral and poverty impacts of agricultural policy adjustments in Colombia. Agricultural Economics. 46, 259–280. /*ref*/Arias, M.A; Ibáñez, A.M; Zambrano, A. (2013). Agricultural Production amidst Conflict: The Effects of Shocks, Uncertainty and Governance of Non-State Armed Actors. Working paper. Universidad de los Andes. pp. 39. /*ref*/Atkinson, G; Bateman, I; Mourato, S. (2012). Recent Advances in the Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 28(2), 22–47. /*ref*/Barbier, B; Sánchez, P; Thomas, R; Wagner, A. (1997). The economic determinants of land degradation in developing countries. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 352(1356), 891-899. /*ref*/Barnosky, A.D; Matzke, N; Tomiya, S; Wogan, G.O.U; Swartz, B; Quental, T.B; Marshall, C; McGuire, J.L; Lindsey, E.L; Maguire, K.C; Mersey, B; Ferrer, B.A. (2011). Has the Earth’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived?. Nature, 471, 51–57. /*ref*/Barrett, C.B; Travis, A.J; Dasgupta, P. (2011). On Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Traps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(34), 13907–13912. /*ref*/Butchart, S.H.M; Walpole, M; Collen, B; van Strien, A; Scharlemann, J.P.W; Almond, R.E.A; Baillie, J.E.M; Bomhard, B; /*ref*/Brown, C; Bruno, J; Carpenter, K.E; Carr, G.M; Chanson, J; Chenery, A.M; Csirke, J; Davidson, N.C. (2010). Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science. 328(5982), 1164–1168. /*ref*/Ceballos, G; Ehrlich, P.R. (2002). Mammal Population Losses and the Extinction Crisis. Science. 296, 904–907. /*ref*/Cecchini, S; Uthoff, A. (2008). Poverty and employment in Latin America: 1990-2005. Cepal Review. 94, 41-56. /*ref*/DANE (2013). Pobreza monetaria y multidimensional en Colombia 2012. Boletín de Prensa, Bogotá, 2013. /*ref*/Dasgupta, S; Laplante, B; Wang, H; Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives.16(1), 147–168. /*ref*/Deke, O. (2008). Environmental Policy Instruments for Conserving Global Biodiversity, Berlin, Springer-Verlag. pp. 392. /*ref*/Dietz, S; Adger, W.N. (2003). Economic Growth, Biodiversity Loss and Conservation Effort. Journal of Environmental Management. 68, 23–35. /*ref*/Fergusson, L; Molina, C.A; Robinson, J.A; Vargas, J.F. (2015). Varieties of clientelism in Colombia. Vote. Buying, patronage Et intimidation. Unpublished. /*ref*/Fergusson, L; Robinson, J. (2015). Committing not to build a State: Theory and Comparative Evidence. Unpublished. /*ref*/Fernandez, M; Ibáñez, A.M; Peña, X. (2011). Adjusting the Labor Supply to Mitigate Violent Shocks: Evidence from Rural Colombia. World Bank Working paper Series. 5684. pp. 53. /*ref*/Fisher, B; Christopher, T. (2007). Poverty and Biodiversity: Measuring the Overlap of Human Poverty and the Biodiversity Hotspots. Ecological Economics. 62(1), 93–101. /*ref*/Grossman, G; Krueger, A. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110(2), 352–377. /*ref*/Harcourt, A.H; Parks, S.A. (2003). Threatened Primates Experience High Human Densities Adding an Index of Threat to the IUCN Red List Criteria. Biological Conservation.109, 137–149. /*ref*/Hooper, D.U; Chapin, F.S; Ewel, J.J; Hector, A; Inchausti, P; Lavorel, S; Lawton, J.H; Lodge, D.M; Loreau, M; Naeem, S; Schmid, B; Setala, H; Symstad, A.J; Vandermeer, J; Wardle, D.A. (2005). Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning: a Consensus of Current Knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75(1), 3–35. /*ref*/Ibáñez, A.M; Muñoz, J.C. (2011). La persistencia de la concentración dé la tierra en Colombia: ¿Qué pasó entre 2000 y 2010? (Notas de Política 9). Bogotá: CEDE. /*ref*/Joumard, I; Londoño, J. (2013a). Income inequality and poverty in Colombia. Part 1. The role of the labour market (Working Paper 1036). OECD Economics Department. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/5k487n74slfl-en (2016, 14 de abril). /*ref*/Joumard, I; Londoño, J. (2013b). Income inequality and poverty in Colombia. Part 2. The redistributive impact of taxes and transfers. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/income-inequa-lity-and-poverty-in-colombia-part-2-theredistributive-impact-of- taxes-and-transfers_5k487n4r0t8s-en. /*ref*/MADR - MINISTERIO DE AGRICULTURA Y DESARROLLO RURAL (2013). Proyecto de Ley de Tierras y Desarrollo Rural. Bogotá D.C. Colombia. pp. 81. Recuperado de: http://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/EABE20872C0EB09B05257B8800760D0C/$FILE/Proyecto_Ley_Tierras_Desarrollo_Rural.pdf (2016, 14 de abril). /*ref*/MADS – MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE Y DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE (2012). Política Nacional Para La Gestión Integral De La Biodiversidad Y Sus Servicios Ecosistémicos (PNGIBSE). Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Bogotá – Colombia. pp. 124. Recuperado de: http://www.portalces.org/sites/default/files/migrated/docs/PNGIBSE_espanol.pdf (2016, 14 de abril). /*ref*/MADS – MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE Y DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE (2013). Manual para la Asignación de Compensaciones por Pérdida de Biodiversidad. Bogotá, D.C. Colombia. pp. 52. Recuperado de: http://www.anla.gov.co/documentos/normativa/13991_Res_1517_2012_Manual_compensac_perdida_biodiversidad.pdf (2016, 14 de abril). /*ref*/MADS – MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE Y DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE (2014). Guía Técnica para la Formulación de los Planes de Ordenación y Manejo de Cuencas Hidrográficas – POMCAS. Bogotá, D.C. Colombia. pp. 104. Recuperado de: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/GestionIntegraldelRecursoHidrico/pdf/cuencas-hidrograficas/Guia-Tecnica-para-la-formulacion-de-planes-de-ordenacion-y-manejo-de-cuencas-hidrograficas-POMCAS.pdf (2016, 14 de abril). /*ref*/MAVDT - MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE, VIVIENDA Y DESARROLLO TERRITORIAL. (2010). Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral del Recurso Hídrico. Bogotá, D.C. Colombia, Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. pp. 124. /*ref*/MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, D. C: Island Press. /*ref*/Mills, J.H; Waite, T.A. (2009). Economic Prosperity, Biodiversity Conservation, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics. 68, 2087–2095. /*ref*/Naidoo, R; Adamowicz, W.L. (2000). Effects of Economic Prosperity on Numbers of Threatened Species. Conservation Biology. 15(4), 1021–1029. /*ref*/Pagiola, S; Bishop, J; Landellmills, N. (2002). Selling forest environmental services: Market based mechanisms for conservation and development. London: Earthscan Publications. pp. 89. /*ref*/Palmer, Ch; Di Falco, S. (2012). Biodiversity, poverty, and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(1), 48–68. /*ref*/Perrings, C; Halkos, G. (2010). Biodiversity Loss and Income Growth in Poor Countries: The Evidence. ecoSERVICES Working Paper. Tempe, Arizona State University. Pp. 135. /*ref*/Pfaff, A; Robalino, J. (2012). Protecting Forests, Biodiversity and the Climate: Predicting Policy Impact to Improve Policy Choice. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 28(2), 164–179. /*ref*/PNUD - Programa de las Naciones Unidas Para el Desarrollo (2014). “Consideraciones ambientales para la construcción de una paz territorial estable, duradera y sostenible en Colombia”. Programa de las Naciones Unidas Para el Desarrollo. Pp 122. /*ref*/Rausser, G.C; Small, A.A. (2000). Valuing Research Leads: Bioprospecting and the Conservation of Genetic Resources. Journal of Political Economy. 108(1), 1–33. /*ref*/Robinson, J.A. (2007) ¿Un típico país latinoamericano? Una perspectiva sobre el desarrollo. En J.A. Robinson M. Urrutia (eds.), Economía colombiana del siglo xx: un análisis cuantitativo. Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica. pp. 678. /*ref*/Robinson, J.A. (2016). La miseria en Colombia. Revista Desarrollo Y Sociedad. 76, 9-90. ISSN 0120-3584. DOI: 10.13043/DYS.76.1 /*ref*/Ruiz, C.A. (2016). ¿Hasta dónde podemos hablar de minería sostenible en Colombia?. Recuperado de: http://www.javeriana.edu.co/educon/blog/mineria-sostenible-en-colombia?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.javeriana.edu.co%2Fweb%2Feducon%2Fblog%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_C0UJgHAk1EKo%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn-2%26p_p_col_pos%3D1%26p_p_col_count%3D2 (2016, 14 de abril). /*ref*/Ruiz, C.A; Bello, C. (2014). ¿El valor de algunos servicios ecosistémicos de los Andes colombianos?: transferencia de beneficios por meta – análisis. Universitas Scientiarum. Vol. 19 (3). 301-322. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.vase. /*ref*/Sánchez, R.M. (2015). Identificación y Caracterización De Los Trabajadores pobres en Colombia, 2002-2012. Revista de Economía Institucional. 7(32), 295-315. /*ref*/Tapasco, J. (2009). Formalización de un modelo de pago por servicios ambientales a nivel de cuenca y algunas de sus incidencias sobre la pobreza rural. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural. 6 (63), 87-105. /*ref*/TEEB (2010). Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. United Nations Environment Programme. pp 120. /*ref*/UN (2011). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Highlights and Advance Tables, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.220, New York, United Nations. pp. 180. /*ref*/Wilson, E.O. (1986). The Current State of Biodiversity. in E.O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 3–18. /*ref*/Wunder, S. (2005). Payment for environmental services. Some nuts and bolts. Jakarta: CIFOR. pp. 24. /*ref*/Zhu, Y; Chen, H; Fan, J; Wang, Y; Li, Y; Chen, J; Fan, J; Yang, S; Ha, L; Leung, H; Mew, T.W; Teng, P.S; Wang, Z; Mundt, C.C. (2000). Genetic Diversity and Disease Control in Rice. Nature, 406, 718–722. /*ref*/Zwane, A.P. (2007). Does Poverty Constrain Deforestation? Econometric Evidence from Peru. Journal of Development Economics. 84, 330–349. Derechos de autor 2016 Ciudad Paz-ando |
| spellingShingle | Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| title | Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| title_full | Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| title_fullStr | Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| title_full_unstemmed | Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| title_short | Biodiversity and poverty in Colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| title_sort | biodiversity and poverty in colombia: an analysis from the institutional approach |
| url | https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/cpaz/article/view/10298 |