The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?

Objective/context: The objective of this article is to analyze the results of the anti-corruption referendum in Colombia in 2018. Colombia is a country with a significant corruption problem. More than 99% of the voters who came to the polls voted in favor of the proposals. However, the anti-corrupt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Michael Haman
Formato: artículo científico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Universidad de Los Andes 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81262336007
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/95420
_version_ 1782338091457970176
author Michael Haman
author_facet Michael Haman
author_sort Michael Haman
collection Repositorio
description Objective/context: The objective of this article is to analyze the results of the anti-corruption referendum in Colombia in 2018. Colombia is a country with a significant corruption problem. More than 99% of the voters who came to the polls voted in favor of the proposals. However, the anti-corruption referendum nonetheless failed because not enough citizens were mobilized to participate. The article addresses the reasons why turnout was very low. Methodology: I examine the results at the municipal level. I present an original dataset of 1,101 Colombian municipalities. I use ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models to test theories based on the literature on referendums, corruption, and transparency. I also analyze voter turnout in the 2018 presidential election in order to compare it with participation in the referendum. Conclusions: I find that the more transparent a municipality, the higher the percentage of the municipal electorate that voted for proposals in the anti-corruption referendum. Moreover, I find that in municipalities where support for Sergio Fajardo in the presidential election was higher and support for Iván Duque was lower, support for the referendum proposals was higher. Also, turnout was lower in municipalities with higher poverty rates and higher homicide rates. Originality: This article contributes to the current global debate on direct democracy. As the anti-corruption referendum was held only recently, a proper analysis has not yet been carried out. Moreover, because of the nature of the referendum questions, the topic is closely connected with research on corruption. Therefore, this research represents a unique opportunity to examine corruption and direct democracy at one and the same time.
format artículo científico
id clacso-CLACSO95420
institution CLACSO, Repositorio Digital
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publisher Universidad de Los Andes
record_format greenstone
spelling clacso-CLACSO954202022-03-22T18:52:56Z The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed? Michael Haman Política Corruption Elections Colombia Referendum Direct Democracy Transparency Objective/context: The objective of this article is to analyze the results of the anti-corruption referendum in Colombia in 2018. Colombia is a country with a significant corruption problem. More than 99% of the voters who came to the polls voted in favor of the proposals. However, the anti-corruption referendum nonetheless failed because not enough citizens were mobilized to participate. The article addresses the reasons why turnout was very low. Methodology: I examine the results at the municipal level. I present an original dataset of 1,101 Colombian municipalities. I use ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models to test theories based on the literature on referendums, corruption, and transparency. I also analyze voter turnout in the 2018 presidential election in order to compare it with participation in the referendum. Conclusions: I find that the more transparent a municipality, the higher the percentage of the municipal electorate that voted for proposals in the anti-corruption referendum. Moreover, I find that in municipalities where support for Sergio Fajardo in the presidential election was higher and support for Iván Duque was lower, support for the referendum proposals was higher. Also, turnout was lower in municipalities with higher poverty rates and higher homicide rates. Originality: This article contributes to the current global debate on direct democracy. As the anti-corruption referendum was held only recently, a proper analysis has not yet been carried out. Moreover, because of the nature of the referendum questions, the topic is closely connected with research on corruption. Therefore, this research represents a unique opportunity to examine corruption and direct democracy at one and the same time. 2019 2022-03-22T18:52:56Z 2022-03-22T18:52:56Z artículo científico http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81262336007 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/95420 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=812 Colombia Internacional application/pdf Universidad de Los Andes Colombia Internacional (Colombia) Num.100
spellingShingle Política
Corruption
Elections
Colombia
Referendum
Direct Democracy
Transparency
Michael Haman
The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?
title The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?
title_full The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?
title_fullStr The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?
title_full_unstemmed The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?
title_short The Colombian Anti-Corruption Referendum: Why It Failed?
title_sort colombian anti-corruption referendum: why it failed?
topic Política
Corruption
Elections
Colombia
Referendum
Direct Democracy
Transparency
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81262336007
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/95420