Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaCroatia Country Report
Popular sovereignty in Croatia can be exercised either by representation, or by direct democracy, i.e. by direct popular involvement in decision making. Following initial overview of legal rules regulating exercise of direct democracy in Croatia, it will be demonstrated that almost complete absence...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Working Paper |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/95813/1/C2D_WP1a.pdf http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/77924 |
| _version_ | 1782339746975973376 |
|---|---|
| author | Siniša, Rodin |
| author_facet | Siniša, Rodin |
| author_sort | Siniša, Rodin |
| collection | Repositorio |
| description | Popular sovereignty in Croatia can be exercised either by representation, or by direct democracy, i.e. by direct popular involvement in decision making. Following initial overview of legal rules regulating exercise of direct democracy in Croatia, it will be demonstrated that almost complete absence of national referenda over the past eight years of Croatia's independence can be explained by specific political consensus among the President of the Republic, the Parliamentary majority and the Government. I will also present relevant decisions of the Constitutional Court on the point and try to answer to what extent probability of referenda in Croatia depends on institutional balance. |
| format | Working Paper |
| id | clacso-CLACSO77924 |
| institution | CLACSO, Repositorio Digital |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| record_format | greenstone |
| spelling | clacso-CLACSO779242022-03-21T20:25:03Z Croatia Country Report Siniša, Rodin C2D Working Paper Series 320 Political science 340 Law 900 History Popular sovereignty in Croatia can be exercised either by representation, or by direct democracy, i.e. by direct popular involvement in decision making. Following initial overview of legal rules regulating exercise of direct democracy in Croatia, it will be demonstrated that almost complete absence of national referenda over the past eight years of Croatia's independence can be explained by specific political consensus among the President of the Republic, the Parliamentary majority and the Government. I will also present relevant decisions of the Constitutional Court on the point and try to answer to what extent probability of referenda in Croatia depends on institutional balance. 2000 2022-03-21T20:25:03Z 2022-03-21T20:25:03Z Working Paper NonPeerReviewed https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/95813/1/C2D_WP1a.pdf urn:issn:1662-8152 (E) http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/77924 eng https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/95813/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Siniša, Rodin (2000). Croatia Country Report. c2d Working Papers Series 1a, Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA) at the University of Zurich. |
| spellingShingle | C2D Working Paper Series 320 Political science 340 Law 900 History Siniša, Rodin Croatia Country Report |
| title | Croatia Country Report |
| title_full | Croatia Country Report |
| title_fullStr | Croatia Country Report |
| title_full_unstemmed | Croatia Country Report |
| title_short | Croatia Country Report |
| title_sort | croatia country report |
| topic | C2D Working Paper Series 320 Political science 340 Law 900 History |
| url | https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/95813/1/C2D_WP1a.pdf http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/77924 |