Kantian anthropology: a science like no other
In this essay I begin by examining Kant’s criteria for “proper science” as presented in the Preface to his Metaphysical Foundations of Science, and then ask whether Kantian anthropology can possibly qualify as a proper science according to these demanding criteria. I defend a qualified ‘yes’ answer...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Lenguaje: | Portugués |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/4121 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72586 |
Sumario: | In this essay I begin by examining Kant’s criteria for “proper science” as presented in the Preface to his Metaphysical Foundations of Science, and then ask whether Kantian anthropology can possibly qualify as a proper science according to these demanding criteria. I defend a qualified ‘yes’ answer to this question, while also drawing attention to several less tidy aspects of his anthropology project that are difficult to fit onto the Procrustean bed of science. |
---|