Universalizing as a Moral Demand

Kant's Categorical Imperative is commonly criticized as being empty, i.e., devoid of content, and therefore unable to generate any concrete duties. More specifically, the criticism is that the imperative rules out (a) too much as being morally forbidden in one respect, (b) too little in another...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: SENSEN, Oliver
Formato: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Lenguaje:Portugués
Publicado: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências 2021
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/3815
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72569
_version_ 1782336168078082048
author SENSEN, Oliver
author_facet SENSEN, Oliver
author_sort SENSEN, Oliver
collection Repositorio
description Kant's Categorical Imperative is commonly criticized as being empty, i.e., devoid of content, and therefore unable to generate any concrete duties. More specifically, the criticism is that the imperative rules out (a) too much as being morally forbidden in one respect, (b) too little in another, and (c) that it rules out maxims for the wrong reasons. In this paper I shallargue that the Categorical Imperative expresses a recognizably moral idea, and consider how it can be used reliably to generateconcrete duties. My claim is that the Categorical Imperative expresses the demand of fairness: One should not make an exception for oneself in the sense that one should not regard oneself as being something better. I shall argue that the main objections against the imperative can be answered if one asks the question: Do I (1) try to make an exception for myself (2) to a rule that I regard to beobjectively necessary?
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id clacso-CLACSO72569
institution CLACSO, Repositorio Digital
language Portugués
publishDate 2021
publisher Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
record_format greenstone
spelling clacso-CLACSO725692022-03-21T17:55:31Z Universalizing as a Moral Demand SENSEN, Oliver Kant's Categorical Imperative is commonly criticized as being empty, i.e., devoid of content, and therefore unable to generate any concrete duties. More specifically, the criticism is that the imperative rules out (a) too much as being morally forbidden in one respect, (b) too little in another, and (c) that it rules out maxims for the wrong reasons. In this paper I shallargue that the Categorical Imperative expresses a recognizably moral idea, and consider how it can be used reliably to generateconcrete duties. My claim is that the Categorical Imperative expresses the demand of fairness: One should not make an exception for oneself in the sense that one should not regard oneself as being something better. I shall argue that the main objections against the imperative can be answered if one asks the question: Do I (1) try to make an exception for myself (2) to a rule that I regard to beobjectively necessary? 2021-09-16 2022-03-21T17:55:30Z 2022-03-21T17:55:30Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/3815 10.36311/2318-0501/2014.v2n1.3815 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72569 por https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/3815/2854 Copyright (c) 2021 Estudos Kantianos [EK] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 application/pdf Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Kantian Studies (EK); Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014) Estudos Kantianos [EK]; v. 2 n. 1 (2014) 2318-0501
spellingShingle SENSEN, Oliver
Universalizing as a Moral Demand
title Universalizing as a Moral Demand
title_full Universalizing as a Moral Demand
title_fullStr Universalizing as a Moral Demand
title_full_unstemmed Universalizing as a Moral Demand
title_short Universalizing as a Moral Demand
title_sort universalizing as a moral demand
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/3815
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72569