Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaAlternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
The connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exp...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Lenguaje: | Portugués |
| Publicado: |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/70715 |
| _version_ | 1782336011046486016 |
|---|---|
| author | Fachin, Juliana Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira Blattmann, Ursula |
| author_facet | Fachin, Juliana Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira Blattmann, Ursula |
| author_sort | Fachin, Juliana |
| collection | Repositorio |
| description | The connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between the traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample comprised the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 5,982 altmetric data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetric data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating it is important for indicating the tools and networks where readers and users share scientific content. |
| format | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| id | clacso-CLACSO70715 |
| institution | CLACSO, Repositorio Digital |
| language | Portugués |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
| record_format | greenstone |
| spelling | clacso-CLACSO707152022-03-21T17:23:20Z Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal Indicadores alternativos y tradicionales de la Revista de Estudios Feministas Brasileira Indicadores alternativos e tradicionais da Revista Estudos Feministas Brasileira Fachin, Juliana Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira Blattmann, Ursula Métricas Alternativas Métricas Tradicionais Publicação de Acesso Aberto Base de dados Dimensions Coeficiente de Pearson Alternative Metrics Traditional Metrics Open Access Publishing Dimensions database Pearson's coefficient The connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between the traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample comprised the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 5,982 altmetric data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetric data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating it is important for indicating the tools and networks where readers and users share scientific content. Los académicos en el campo de los estudios métricos han recomendado la conexión de indicadores tradicionales y alternativos de impacto académico, ya que se consideran complementarios y ofrecen una imagen más completa de la evaluación de los resultados de la investigación. Desde esta perspectiva, el presente estudio exploratorio descriptivo tuvo como objetivo analizar el coeficiente de correlación entre el impacto tradicional y alternativo de la Revista Estudos Feministas. La muestra abarcó el período comprendido entre 2001 y 2018. Los datos de análisis se obtuvieron de la base de datos de Dimensiones a través de API. Se analizaron 1.296 textos con 2.609 citas y 5.982 datos altimétricos. Los resultados mostraron que Mendeley obtuvo una evaluación positiva en la correlación del coeficiente de Pearson en comparación con la cantidad de artículos publicados y con los indicadores de cita y visibilidad. El estudio encontró que los datos alternativos son 4.6 veces más grandes que los datos tradicionales, aunque fluctuar es importante para indicar las herramientas y las redes donde los lectores y los usuarios comparten contenido científico. A conexão de indicadores tradicionais e alternativos de impacto acadêmico têm sido recomendados por estudiosos do campo dos estudos métricos por serem considerados complementares e oferecerem um quadro mais completo da avaliação de resultados de pesquisa. A partir dessa perspectiva o presente estudo de cunho exploratório descritivo, teve o objetivo de analisar o coeficiente de correlação entre o impacto tradicional e alternativas da Revista Estudos Feministas. A amostra constituiu o período de 2001 a 2018. Os dados de análise foram obtidos na base Dimensions via API. Foram analisados 1.296 textos que contaram com 2.609 citações e 5.982 dados altmétricos. Os resultados apontaram que o Mendeley obteve uma avaliação positiva na correlação do coeficiente de Pearson ao ser comparada com o quantitativo de artigos publicados e com os indicadores de citação e visibilidade. O estudo detectou que os dados altmétricos são 4,6 vezes maiores que o tradicional, apesar de flutuantes eles são importantes para a indicação das ferramentas e redes onde estão os leitores e usuários que compartilham conteúdo científico. 2020-03-27 2022-03-21T17:23:20Z 2022-03-21T17:23:20Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255 10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.06.p112 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/70715 por https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255/6285 application/pdf Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 No. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129 Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129 Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 14 n. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129 1981-1640 |
| spellingShingle | Métricas Alternativas Métricas Tradicionais Publicação de Acesso Aberto Base de dados Dimensions Coeficiente de Pearson Alternative Metrics Traditional Metrics Open Access Publishing Dimensions database Pearson's coefficient Fachin, Juliana Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira Blattmann, Ursula Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal |
| title | Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal |
| title_full | Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal |
| title_fullStr | Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal |
| title_full_unstemmed | Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal |
| title_short | Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal |
| title_sort | alternative and traditional indicators of the brazilian feminist studies journal |
| topic | Métricas Alternativas Métricas Tradicionais Publicação de Acesso Aberto Base de dados Dimensions Coeficiente de Pearson Alternative Metrics Traditional Metrics Open Access Publishing Dimensions database Pearson's coefficient |
| url | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/70715 |