Shoemakers before industry: notes on two heterodox interpretation

The article aimed to compare two approaches that sought to characterize and analyze the evolution of manufacturing and shoe manufacturing in the period of transition that preceded the creation of the great capitalist industrial enterprise. This activity was investigated by two authors, different in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Guedes, Sebastião Neto Ribeiro
Formato: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Lenguaje:Portugués
Publicado: Departamento de Economia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/iniciativa/article/view/9108
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/64939
Descripción
Sumario:The article aimed to compare two approaches that sought to characterize and analyze the evolution of manufacturing and shoe manufacturing in the period of transition that preceded the creation of the great capitalist industrial enterprise. This activity was investigated by two authors, different in terms of methodological affiliation and relatively distant in chronological terms. In fact, although John R. Commons joins the Institutional Economy and Eric Hobsbawn in Marxist historiography, both converge on important aspects when investigating shoe manufacturing. In particular when shifting the emphasis from the processes of change within the activity of technology to changes in the market.