Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaThe three dependency interpretation
In the 1950s two groups of public intellectuals, organized around ECLAC, in Santiago, Chile, and ISEB, in Rio de Janeiro, pioneered the thinking on Latin American societies and on its industrialization from a nationalist standpoint. ECLAC mainly criticized the law of comparative advantage; ISEB focu...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Lenguaje: | Portugués |
| Publicado: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/4099 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/61317 |
| _version_ | 1782338497932165120 |
|---|---|
| author | Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos |
| author_facet | Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos |
| author_sort | Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos |
| collection | Repositorio |
| description | In the 1950s two groups of public intellectuals, organized around ECLAC, in Santiago, Chile, and ISEB, in Rio de Janeiro, pioneered the thinking on Latin American societies and on its industrialization from a nationalist standpoint. ECLAC mainly criticized the law of comparative advantage; ISEB focused on the class coalition behind the proposed national-developmentalist strategy. The idea of a national bourgeoisie was key to this interpretation. Yet, the Cuban revolution and the following military coups in the South Cone made room for criticism of these ideas by the Marxist dependency interpretation which soon was divided in three: the overexploitation, the national-dependency contradiction, and the associated dependency interpretation. The later ignored the ambiguous and contradictory character of the Latin-American bourgeoisie asserted by the national-dependent interpretation,turned dominant in the region, contributed to the loss of the idea ofnation by the Brazilian intellectuals, and represented an obstacleto the definition of a national-development strategy. |
| format | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| id | clacso-CLACSO61317 |
| institution | CLACSO, Repositorio Digital |
| language | Portugués |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP |
| record_format | greenstone |
| spelling | clacso-CLACSO613172022-03-18T16:17:20Z The three dependency interpretation As três interpretações da dependência Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos National bourgeoisie Nationalism Developmentalism Dependency Burguesia nacional Nacionalismo Desenvolvimentismo Dependência In the 1950s two groups of public intellectuals, organized around ECLAC, in Santiago, Chile, and ISEB, in Rio de Janeiro, pioneered the thinking on Latin American societies and on its industrialization from a nationalist standpoint. ECLAC mainly criticized the law of comparative advantage; ISEB focused on the class coalition behind the proposed national-developmentalist strategy. The idea of a national bourgeoisie was key to this interpretation. Yet, the Cuban revolution and the following military coups in the South Cone made room for criticism of these ideas by the Marxist dependency interpretation which soon was divided in three: the overexploitation, the national-dependency contradiction, and the associated dependency interpretation. The later ignored the ambiguous and contradictory character of the Latin-American bourgeoisie asserted by the national-dependent interpretation,turned dominant in the region, contributed to the loss of the idea ofnation by the Brazilian intellectuals, and represented an obstacleto the definition of a national-development strategy. Nos anos 1950 dois grupos de intelectuais públicos, organizados em torno da CEPAL, em Santiago do Chile, e do ISEB, no Rio de Janeiro, pensaram a América Latina de forma pioneira de um ponto de vista nacionalista. A CEPAL criticou a lei das vantagens comparativas; o ISEB concentrou sua atenção na coalizão de classes burguesa e burocrática por trás da estratégia nacional de desenvolvimento proposta. A existência de uma burguesia nacional era fundamental para esta interpretação. Entretanto, a Revolução Cubana e os golpes militares modernizantes que se seguiram abriram espaço para a crítica dessas ideias pela interpretação marxista da dependência que se dividiu em três: a da super-exploração, a da dependência associada e a contradição nacional-dependente. A interpretação da dependência associada ignorou o caráter ambíguo e contraditório da burguesia da região proposto pela interpretação nacional-dependente, tornouse dominante, contribuiu para que os intelectuais brasileiros perdessem a ideia de nação, e representou um obstáculo à definição de uma estratégia nacional de desenvolvimento. 2011-04-25 2022-03-18T16:17:20Z 2022-03-18T16:17:20Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/4099 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/61317 por https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/4099/3735 Copyright (c) 2011 Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais application/pdf Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 38 (2010) 1984-0241 0101-3459 |
| spellingShingle | National bourgeoisie Nationalism Developmentalism Dependency Burguesia nacional Nacionalismo Desenvolvimentismo Dependência Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos The three dependency interpretation |
| title | The three dependency interpretation |
| title_full | The three dependency interpretation |
| title_fullStr | The three dependency interpretation |
| title_full_unstemmed | The three dependency interpretation |
| title_short | The three dependency interpretation |
| title_sort | three dependency interpretation |
| topic | National bourgeoisie Nationalism Developmentalism Dependency Burguesia nacional Nacionalismo Desenvolvimentismo Dependência |
| url | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/4099 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/61317 |