Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice

This paper provides a review of the philosophical traditions on the study of social inequality and recent theories of justice. On the one hand, it sets forth the fundamental ideas of those philosophers who have been labeled as conservative or functionalists and have defended inequality as something...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ángel García B.
Formato: artículo científico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Universidad Central de Venezuela 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36412206
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/43501
_version_ 1782335869857824768
author Ángel García B.
author_facet Ángel García B.
author_sort Ángel García B.
collection Repositorio
description This paper provides a review of the philosophical traditions on the study of social inequality and recent theories of justice. On the one hand, it sets forth the fundamental ideas of those philosophers who have been labeled as conservative or functionalists and have defended inequality as something which is expected to be just and inevitable. On the other hand, it presents, as well, the ideas of those philosophers known as radicals who state not only that social inequality is unjust, but rather that it is evitable as well. Subsequently, the paper describes the main ideas concentrated in what Lenski (1993) calls the growing dialectic synthesis of the theory of social stratification which incorporates elements from both traditions. The paper reviews the theories of distribution based on the principles of political economy proposed by the classical economists, and contrasts them with those proposed by the marginalist theory and the theory of social stratification. In doing so, the paper briefly considers the relationship between technology, and political instruments of distribution such as needs, power and privileges. Regarding the recent theories of justice, the paper mainly focuses on the proposals of Rawls (1971) and Nozick (1974). Finally, with respect to the current state of affairs, the roles of information-based technology and modern post-Bretton Woods financial institutions are briefly discussed -in terms of their complementarities- to explain the well known persistent increase in global social inequality.
format artículo científico
id clacso-CLACSO43501
institution CLACSO, Repositorio Digital
language Inglés
publishDate 2006
publisher Universidad Central de Venezuela
record_format greenstone
spelling clacso-CLACSO435012022-03-17T15:40:43Z Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice Ángel García B. Economía y Finanzas Technology needs power functionalists radicals This paper provides a review of the philosophical traditions on the study of social inequality and recent theories of justice. On the one hand, it sets forth the fundamental ideas of those philosophers who have been labeled as conservative or functionalists and have defended inequality as something which is expected to be just and inevitable. On the other hand, it presents, as well, the ideas of those philosophers known as radicals who state not only that social inequality is unjust, but rather that it is evitable as well. Subsequently, the paper describes the main ideas concentrated in what Lenski (1993) calls the growing dialectic synthesis of the theory of social stratification which incorporates elements from both traditions. The paper reviews the theories of distribution based on the principles of political economy proposed by the classical economists, and contrasts them with those proposed by the marginalist theory and the theory of social stratification. In doing so, the paper briefly considers the relationship between technology, and political instruments of distribution such as needs, power and privileges. Regarding the recent theories of justice, the paper mainly focuses on the proposals of Rawls (1971) and Nozick (1974). Finally, with respect to the current state of affairs, the roles of information-based technology and modern post-Bretton Woods financial institutions are briefly discussed -in terms of their complementarities- to explain the well known persistent increase in global social inequality. 2006 2022-03-17T15:40:43Z 2022-03-17T15:40:43Z artículo científico http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36412206 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/43501 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=364 Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura application/pdf Universidad Central de Venezuela Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura (Venezuela) Num.2 Vol.XII
spellingShingle Economía y Finanzas
Technology needs power functionalists radicals
Ángel García B.
Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
title Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
title_full Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
title_fullStr Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
title_full_unstemmed Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
title_short Technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
title_sort technology, needs and power as means of distribution and justice
topic Economía y Finanzas
Technology needs power functionalists radicals
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36412206
http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/43501