Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaPsychoanalysis and feminisms: controversial and productive milestones of an ambivalent bond
From the very constitution of the psychoanalytical framework during the first half of the twentieth century, different bonds between psychoanalysis and feminism begin to be tested. The main feminist theorists face the need to refer to Freud and delineate strong criticisms of the phallocentric contri...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Género. IdIHCS (CONICET - UNLP). Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.descentrada.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/DESe098 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/33973 |
| Sumario: | From the very constitution of the psychoanalytical framework during the first half of the twentieth century, different bonds between psychoanalysis and feminism begin to be tested. The main feminist theorists face the need to refer to Freud and delineate strong criticisms of the phallocentric contribution of his thinking. On the other hand, other feminist intellectuals highlight the complexity and vastness of psychoanalytic theory emphasizing, no longer the bias of the historical horizon of its emergence, but the potentiality of categories that provide clues to think the problem of the subject in its greatest possible complexity. Considering this conceptual territory, links and divergences are explored towards a possible cartographic delimitation. |
|---|