Biblioteca Digital de VanguardiaA method for discourse. Some reflections on and from Foucault`s archaeology
This paper will make a critical reflection on and from Michel Foucault ´s archeology, in both methodological design to investigate the discursive formations and rebuild the episteme. To do this, we will discuss what Foucault and other thinkers have reflected from the archeology, but also resort to t...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
2016
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.relmecs.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/relmecse009 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/27539 |
| Sumario: | This paper will make a critical reflection on and from Michel Foucault ´s archeology, in both methodological design to investigate the discursive formations and rebuild the episteme. To do this, we will discuss what Foucault and other thinkers have reflected from the archeology, but also resort to the suggestions and precautions that Pierre Bourdieu provides us with respect to reflection on research in Social and Human Sciences. In this way, archeology may be considered for the inquiry in the above sciences. Thus first, we will deal with archeology in Foucault`s terms presented, as well as the constraints involved in position of this and the possibilities that are opened from our review. This implies that critically revise the words with which the French thinker realizes how appropriate his own method. Then we will briefly explore the category of episteme and concepts that relate to it. Next we will specify the particulars of abductive reasoning, that fits perfectly with the archaeological procedure.We will finish our work with the relevant build analogies from the evidence offered by the abduction specifications. This procedure, in our view, complete the contribution of abductive reasoning to archaeological method, allowing to reconstruct the discursive formations and, thus, the episteme. |
|---|