The disentail of corporative civil lands in Mexico: an agrarian law, a fiscal law or both? An approximation to the historiographical tendencies
The article makes a historiographical revision that questions the hypothesis that the disentail (desamortización) of civil lands deprived of the lands or destituted the indigenous people of Mexico. This allows us to consider other issues about political, social and institutional actors that hadn...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Centro de Historia Argentina y Americana
2012
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.mundoagrario.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/MAv13n25a09 http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/26594 |
Sumario: | The article makes a historiographical revision that questions the hypothesis that the disentail (desamortización) of civil lands deprived of the lands or destituted the indigenous people of Mexico. This allows us to consider other issues about political, social and institutional actors that hadn't received enough attention from historians related to the aftermath of the Law of 1856, as town councils, lawyers and *tinterillos*. This work aims to solve methodological problems about the interpretation of the type of land that were disentailed since there hadn't been done a corographic or scenery analysis. |
---|